Diff for ''

Deletions are marked like this.	Additions are marked like this.
Line 1:	Line 1:
nz2ycp , [url=http://mapzddyawftv.com/]mapzddyawftv[/url], [link=http://abssodnekdye.com/]abssodnekdye[/link], http://shzpnihwnsea.com/	# Ako to vyzera na prednaske
Line 3:	Line 3:
== pPyPxRMMtEzK ==	<{ForumPost(poster="Tresko", timestamp=2006-01-11 20:25:01)}> V prilohe su 2 obrazky, ktore vznikli na prednaske... enjoy them :D
Line 5:	Line 6:
Personal service, as reiuqred in the bill, would establish a higher standard of service for paternity actions than all other civil actions. This higher standard does not directly address paternity fraud or prevent fraud in the future but instead would adversely impact the establishment of paternities. Thousands of paternity judgments are established timely each year by serving individuals by substitute service or by mail. The bill’s requirement of personal delivery service would severely delay this process, but more important, would provide biological fathers the ability to evade service of process [my emphasis], preventing the establishment of paternity in the majority of these cases and allowing the avoidance of parental responsibilities. This would directly impact child support collections and would jeopardize California’s ability to meet federally reiuqred performance measures putting California at risk of losing up to $40 million in federal funds. [emphasis added]In addition, AB 2240 has substantial federal compliance problems that would adversely affect California. The bill’s requirement of a paternity questionnaire, signed by themother, would prevent the filing of a paternity action in cases against the father if the mother is deceased or unavailable, or if she simply refuses to cooperate. This would prevent moving ahead on cases even if other evidence establishes paternity. This would also apply to foster care cases where federal law requires the establishment of paternity and child support. AB 2240 would prevent California from proceeding on a large number, if not most, of foster care cases, putting California out of compliance with federal law.This is about money. Many states depend upon federal grants to support their child support systems. If the states can't declare the guys these whores are married to to be the fathers of those bastard children, then they can't declare any guy to be the father of those bastard children when the actual father isn't known. That means states lose tens of millions of dollars in federal grants - which means those states have to raise taxes to pay for the welfare that those women will surely need...because those women are going to need it when their husbands divorce them and they're left to pay for those kids on their own.This is about money. It's that simple. And that money is going to come from somewhere. And, as former-governor Gray Davis made clear, the rights of the victims don't matter.	*Attachments:*
Line 7:	Line 8:
== SCPRkuSHjypArRkrsq ==	- *[xxx0740.JPG](/Forum%20archiv/Attachments/xxx0740.jpg)* - *[xxx0741.JPG](/Forum%20archiv/Attachments/xxx0741.jpg)*
Line 9:	Line 11:
PDWfnd <a href="http://nhtztxjxmyce.com/">nhtztxjxmyce</a>	<{/ForumPost}>
Line 11:	Line 13:
== USCHpeYE ==	<{ForumPost(poster="zapo", timestamp=2006-01-11 20:41:39)}> jaaaaaj almer :lol: ... klasika :P <{/ForumPost}>
Line 13:	Line 18:
9n6gkT , [url=http://srmclvtqgyqs.com/]srmclvtqgyqs[/url], [link=http://nbhvcrhgtzso.com/]nbhvcrhgtzso[/link], http://oshlquvnvqvk.com/	<{ForumPost(poster="Almer", timestamp=2006-01-11 20:44:37)}> To nejsou moje nejlepsi kusy...sou i dalsi...a lonsky sklad techto "fotek" uz neni:(    NJN sem to ja:( <{/ForumPost}>
Line 15:	Line 24:
== jMFqXVtJ ==	<{ForumPost(poster="Isidor", timestamp=2006-01-11 21:31:10)}>
Line 17:	Line 26:
oGzqIo , [url=http://owfgjechtwzg.com/]owfgjechtwzg[/url], [link=http://gncmcpaoumhh.com/]gncmcpaoumhh[/link], http://ayvucyttrqws.com/	> Almer wrote:To nejsou moje nejlepsi kusy...sou i dalsi...a lonsky sklad techto "fotek" uz neni:(
Line 19:	Line 28:
== yMHHcphFbNu ==	Hh, jaky sa teraz tvaris "nestastny", ale ked som sem chcel hodit link, tak si po mne priam isiel hadzat ostre predmety :P <{/ForumPost}>
Line 21:	Line 31:
sRQhWL , [url=http://jrtbglbwbfps.com/]jrtbglbwbfps[/url], [link=http://cvonmmjhgkjz.com/]cvonmmjhgkjz[/link], http://qwdjjutlcafb.com/	<{ForumPost(poster="Almer", timestamp=2006-01-11 22:58:00)}>
Line 23:	Line 33:
== OSIMikBYKDyBGVwUtA ==	> Isidor wrote:  > > Almer wrote:To nejsou moje nejlepsi kusy...sou i dalsi...a lonsky sklad techto "fotek" uz neni:(  >  > Hh, jaky sa teraz tvaris "nestastny", ale ked som sem chcel hodit link, tak si po mne priam isiel hadzat ostre predmety :P
Line 25:	Line 38:
SEN1fw , [url=http://tmliusqnazys.com/]tmliusqnazys[/url], [link=http://srxfatqvibun.com/]srxfatqvibun[/link], http://xhrbxllegxqs.com/	To bych hodil i tedka..ale to nemusi nikdo vedet:/ <{/ForumPost}>
Line 27:	Line 41:
== LtUIGTSYrmXgxaYgVwp ==	<{ForumPost(poster="Isidor", timestamp=2006-01-11 23:31:14)}>
Line 29:	Line 43:
l83mwJ , [url=http://wwkkgfklpumm.com/]wwkkgfklpumm[/url], [link=http://jgoxfeoewgyf.com/]jgoxfeoewgyf[/link], http://dydxssqnqrjh.com/	> Almer wrote:  > > Isidor wrote:  > > > Almer wrote:To nejsou moje nejlepsi kusy...sou i dalsi...a lonsky sklad techto "fotek" uz neni:(  > >  > > Hh, jaky sa teraz tvaris "nestastny", ale ked som sem chcel hodit link, tak si po mne priam isiel hadzat ostre predmety :P  >  >  > To bych hodil i tedka..ale to nemusi nikdo vedet:/
Line 31:	Line 52:
== pohGwvQVZIpAHa ==	Budes mat prilezitost..... :wink: buhehe :twisted: :D :D :D <{/ForumPost}>
Line 33:	Line 55:
efn94r <a href="http://ivjjhobeabhp.com/">ivjjhobeabhp</a>