Matfyz Wiki
Diff for ''
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| nz2ycp , [url=http://mapzddyawftv.com/]mapzddyawftv[/url], [link=http://abssodnekdye.com/]abssodnekdye[/link], http://shzpnihwnsea.com/ | # Bakalářka musí jít k oponentovi do 10.5., je to pravda? |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| == pPyPxRMMtEzK == | <{ForumPost(poster="keff", timestamp=2008-04-30 14:06:52)}> Ahoj, dneska jsem od dvou různých lidí slyšel, že máme bakalářku odevzdat (hotovou) do cca 10-14.5. oponentovi a do 30.5. ji na studijní doručit *VČETNĚ OPONENTURY*, co je na tom pravdy? Dost mě to děsí, pokud by to tak bylo, a hlavně se o tom nikde nic nepíše. Třeba tady: [http://www.mff.cuni.cz/studium/obecne/b ... uvodce.htm](http://www.mff.cuni.cz/studium/obecne/bplayout/pruvodce.htm): |
| Line 5: | Line 8: |
| Personal service, as reiuqred in the bill, would establish a higher standard of service for paternity actions than all other civil actions. This higher standard does not directly address paternity fraud or prevent fraud in the future but instead would adversely impact the establishment of paternities. Thousands of paternity judgments are established timely each year by serving individuals by substitute service or by mail. The bill’s requirement of personal delivery service would severely delay this process, but more important, would provide biological fathers the ability to evade service of process [my emphasis], preventing the establishment of paternity in the majority of these cases and allowing the avoidance of parental responsibilities. This would directly impact child support collections and would jeopardize California’s ability to meet federally reiuqred performance measures putting California at risk of losing up to $40 million in federal funds. [emphasis added]In addition, AB 2240 has substantial federal compliance problems that would adversely affect California. The bill’s requirement of a paternity questionnaire, signed by themother, would prevent the filing of a paternity action in cases against the father if the mother is deceased or unavailable, or if she simply refuses to cooperate. This would prevent moving ahead on cases even if other evidence establishes paternity. This would also apply to foster care cases where federal law requires the establishment of paternity and child support. AB 2240 would prevent California from proceeding on a large number, if not most, of foster care cases, putting California out of compliance with federal law.This is about money. Many states depend upon federal grants to support their child support systems. If the states can't declare the guys these whores are married to to be the fathers of those bastard children, then they can't declare any guy to be the father of those bastard children when the actual father isn't known. That means states lose tens of millions of dollars in federal grants - which means those states have to raise taxes to pay for the welfare that those women will surely need...because those women are going to need it when their husbands divorce them and they're left to pay for those kids on their own.This is about money. It's that simple. And that money is going to come from somewhere. And, as former-governor Gray Davis made clear, the rights of the victims don't matter. | > Odevzdávání a posuzování > > Termín odevzdání bakalářské práce je uveden v harmonogramu akademického roku, u letních obhajob je to zpravidla konec května. ***Po* odevzdání práce proběhne její oponentní posouzení**, které je spolu s posudkem vedoucího práce nezbytným podkladem k obhajobě před komisí pro státní závěrečnou zkoušku. |
| Line 7: | Line 12: |
| == SCPRkuSHjypArRkrsq == | Ale stejně mi nejde do hlavy kde několik lidí kteří se navzájem neznají přišlo na tenhle fakt - nevíte o tom někdo něco, prosím? PS: doufám že tohle fórum ještě není mrtvé :) <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 9: | Line 17: |
| PDWfnd <a href="http://nhtztxjxmyce.com/">nhtztxjxmyce</a> | <{ForumPost(poster="Tuetschek", timestamp=2008-05-01 00:28:44)}> Letos nemuzu soudit, ale vloni to tak nebylo a prijde mi to jako nesmysl -- vzdyt co by s tou bakalarkou pak cely mesic na tom studijnim delali? Mimochodem, my jsme bakalarky nenosili na studijni, ale pani Dejmkove do kancelare na Malou Stranu. <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 11: | Line 22: |
| == USCHpeYE == | <{ForumPost(poster="gASK", timestamp=2008-05-01 11:14:46)}> Hoaxy se koukám vyskytují všude ;) Je to nesmysl, už proto, že oponenta si nevybíráš sám (až na výjimky), druhak proto, že ve studijním řádu je to jasně popsaný. V případě jakýchkoliv podobných nejasností pak není problém napsat na studijní oddělení, kde ti promptně pošlou fundovanou odpověd. Na druhou stranu by mne zajímalo, jak by se paní Dejmková tvářila, kdyby ji někdo donesl tu bakalářku i včetně oponentury :twisted: Nezkusí to někdo? <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 13: | Line 28: |
| 9n6gkT , [url=http://srmclvtqgyqs.com/]srmclvtqgyqs[/url], [link=http://nbhvcrhgtzso.com/]nbhvcrhgtzso[/link], http://oshlquvnvqvk.com/ | <{ForumPost(poster="keff", timestamp=2008-05-01 21:36:24)}> OKi, díky :). Říkal jsem si že to bude nějaký hoax, ale přišel od dvou různých lidí najednou, tak jsem se bál že na každém šprochu pravdy trochu... kdyby nebyl svátek tak už mám odpověď od studijního oddělení :) <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 15: | Line 32: |
| == jMFqXVtJ == oGzqIo , [url=http://owfgjechtwzg.com/]owfgjechtwzg[/url], [link=http://gncmcpaoumhh.com/]gncmcpaoumhh[/link], http://ayvucyttrqws.com/ == yMHHcphFbNu == sRQhWL , [url=http://jrtbglbwbfps.com/]jrtbglbwbfps[/url], [link=http://cvonmmjhgkjz.com/]cvonmmjhgkjz[/link], http://qwdjjutlcafb.com/ == OSIMikBYKDyBGVwUtA == SEN1fw , [url=http://tmliusqnazys.com/]tmliusqnazys[/url], [link=http://srxfatqvibun.com/]srxfatqvibun[/link], http://xhrbxllegxqs.com/ == LtUIGTSYrmXgxaYgVwp == l83mwJ , [url=http://wwkkgfklpumm.com/]wwkkgfklpumm[/url], [link=http://jgoxfeoewgyf.com/]jgoxfeoewgyf[/link], http://dydxssqnqrjh.com/ == pohGwvQVZIpAHa == efn94r <a href="http://ivjjhobeabhp.com/">ivjjhobeabhp</a> |