Diff for ''

Revision 26
Author:
cernyj27
Time:
2024-06-02 14:35
Revision 1
Time:
2024-06-13 22:30
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
nz2ycp , [url=http://mapzddyawftv.com/]mapzddyawftv[/url], [link=http://abssodnekdye.com/]abssodnekdye[/link], http://shzpnihwnsea.com/ # rozvrh
Line 3: Line 3:
== pPyPxRMMtEzK == <{ForumPost(poster="hjklg", timestamp=2010-01-25 20:09:27)}>
Nemá někdo představu, kdy by asi mohl bejt zveřejněnej rozvrh?
<{/ForumPost}>
Line 5: Line 7:
Personal service, as reiuqred in the bill, would establish a higher standard of service for paternity actions than all other civil actions. This higher standard does not directly address paternity fraud or prevent fraud in the future but instead would adversely impact the establishment of paternities. Thousands of paternity judgments are established timely each year by serving individuals by substitute service or by mail. The bill’s requirement of personal delivery service would severely delay this process, but more important, would provide biological fathers the ability to evade service of process [my emphasis], preventing the establishment of paternity in the majority of these cases and allowing the avoidance of parental responsibilities. This would directly impact child support collections and would jeopardize California’s ability to meet federally reiuqred performance measures putting California at risk of losing up to $40 million in federal funds. [emphasis added]In addition, AB 2240 has substantial federal compliance problems that would adversely affect California. The bill’s requirement of a paternity questionnaire, signed by themother, would prevent the filing of a paternity action in cases against the father if the mother is deceased or unavailable, or if she simply refuses to cooperate. This would prevent moving ahead on cases even if other evidence establishes paternity. This would also apply to foster care cases where federal law requires the establishment of paternity and child support. AB 2240 would prevent California from proceeding on a large number, if not most, of foster care cases, putting California out of compliance with federal law.This is about money. Many states depend upon federal grants to support their child support systems. If the states can't declare the guys these whores are married to to be the fathers of those bastard children, then they can't declare any guy to be the father of those bastard children when the actual father isn't known. That means states lose tens of millions of dollars in federal grants - which means those states have to raise taxes to pay for the welfare that those women will surely need...because those women are going to need it when their husbands divorce them and they're left to pay for those kids on their own.This is about money. It's that simple. And that money is going to come from somewhere. And, as former-governor Gray Davis made clear, the rights of the victims don't matter. <{ForumPost(poster="Pitr2311", timestamp=2010-01-25 22:56:10)}>
ocakaval by som ho tak tyzden, maximalne dva pred koncom skuskoveho, teda najskor v case medzi 8.2. a 15.2.
<{/ForumPost}>
Line 7: Line 11:
== SCPRkuSHjypArRkrsq == <{ForumPost(poster="jesenka", timestamp=2010-02-04 21:52:33)}>
Viditelný 16.2., komplet hotový asi později.
<{/ForumPost}>
Line 9: Line 15:
PDWfnd <a href="http://nhtztxjxmyce.com/">nhtztxjxmyce</a> <{ForumPost(poster="Prince_of_Persia", timestamp=2010-02-04 22:16:11)}>
Line 11: Line 17:
== USCHpeYE == &nbsp;> jesenka wrote:Viditelný 16.2., komplet hotový asi později.
Line 13: Line 19:
9n6gkT , [url=http://srmclvtqgyqs.com/]srmclvtqgyqs[/url], [link=http://nbhvcrhgtzso.com/]nbhvcrhgtzso[/link], http://oshlquvnvqvk.com/ Ten datum je od rozvrhove komise?
&nbsp;&nbsp;
Mimochodem v SISu momentalne existuje klicka, diky ktere se da rozvrh
prohlizet - zkuste si modul Zapis a prihlasovani k rozvrhu... Pro predbezne
zapsane predmety se vam zobrazi nejake rozvrhove listky. Tohle povazuji
za BUG nikoli za ficuru
<{/ForumPost}>
Line 15: Line 27:
== jMFqXVtJ == <{ForumPost(poster="QZuzka", timestamp=2010-02-04 23:12:54)}>
Line 17: Line 29:
oGzqIo , [url=http://owfgjechtwzg.com/]owfgjechtwzg[/url], [link=http://gncmcpaoumhh.com/]gncmcpaoumhh[/link], http://ayvucyttrqws.com/ &nbsp;> Prince_of_Persia wrote:
&nbsp;> > jesenka wrote:Viditelný 16.2., komplet hotový asi později.
&nbsp;>
&nbsp;>
&nbsp;> Ten datum je od rozvrhove komise?
&nbsp;>
&nbsp;> Mimochodem v SISu momentalne existuje klicka, diky ktere se da rozvrh
&nbsp;> prohlizet - zkuste si modul Zapis a prihlasovani k rozvrhu... Pro predbezne
&nbsp;> zapsane predmety se vam zobrazi nejake rozvrhove listky. Tohle povazuji
&nbsp;> za BUG nikoli za ficuru
Line 19: Line 40:
== yMHHcphFbNu == Je to dobrá věc :), akorát se to dost mele.. Jeden den přes to něco naklikáš a druhý den koukáš, jaký nesmysl z toho vyšel.
<{/ForumPost}>
Line 21: Line 43:
sRQhWL , [url=http://jrtbglbwbfps.com/]jrtbglbwbfps[/url], [link=http://cvonmmjhgkjz.com/]cvonmmjhgkjz[/link], http://qwdjjutlcafb.com/ <{ForumPost(poster="tendor", timestamp=2010-02-05 17:35:28)}>
Předběžná verze je vidět už dneska nejen přes lístky, ale připadá mi to trochu pošahaný...
<{/ForumPost}>
Line 23: Line 47:
== OSIMikBYKDyBGVwUtA == <{ForumPost(poster="Prince_of_Persia", timestamp=2010-02-05 17:43:47)}>
Co konkretne ti prijde posahany?
Me nejvic to, ze se muzu zapisovat k rozvrhovym listkum, ktere se meni.
&nbsp;&nbsp;
IMHO by melo byt prihlasovani k rozvrhu povoleny az od chvile, kdy
bude rozvrh finalni. Pokud si vzpomenu tak to hodim do ankety
jako pripominku k rozvrhu
<{/ForumPost}>
Line 25: Line 56:
SEN1fw , [url=http://tmliusqnazys.com/]tmliusqnazys[/url], [link=http://srxfatqvibun.com/]srxfatqvibun[/link], http://xhrbxllegxqs.com/ <{ForumPost(poster="tendor", timestamp=2010-02-05 18:10:12)}>
Třeba že u TV vydím jen dva lístky ze tří a dle rozvrhu mi přísluší ten třetí...
<{/ForumPost}>
Line 27: Line 60:
== LtUIGTSYrmXgxaYgVwp == <{ForumPost(poster="pasky", timestamp=2010-02-05 20:46:24)}>
Ja jsem naopak vedl dosti vehementni mailovou konverzaci s adminem SISu, aby byl rozvrh videt uz ted, a to nejen pres zapsane rozvrhove listky, ale i v RozvrhNG. Nevim, nakolik to prispelo k tomu, ze ode dneska uz je videt i v RozvrhNG, nebo ci to bylo dopredu planovano. Kazdopadne mi prislo uplne logicke, ze by to takhle byt melo...
&nbsp;&nbsp;
Minimalne u vetsiny zakladnich prednasek je jiz rozvrh v tehle chvili priblizne finalni, maximalne se meni ucebny atd., alespon AFAIK a AFAICS. Kdyz se mne pak zepta vyucujici, ktera cviceni bych mohl vest, nebo si potrebuji naplanovat nejake jine casove aktivity v semestru, musim si kreslit vlastni predbezny rozvrh podle zapsanych rozvrhovych listku, misto aby mi SIS mohl ukazat grid view - samozrejme musim pocitat s tim, ze se sem tam neco jeste zmeni, ale ze by se masivne presypavala polovina prednasek je snad uz dost nepravdepodobne. Nevidim tedy nic spatneho na tom, ze je viditelny predbezny rozvrh, naopak to velice vitam, jenom by melo byt mnohem prominentneji videt, ze jde o rozvrh predbezny.
<{/ForumPost}>
Line 29: Line 66:
l83mwJ , [url=http://wwkkgfklpumm.com/]wwkkgfklpumm[/url], [link=http://jgoxfeoewgyf.com/]jgoxfeoewgyf[/link], http://dydxssqnqrjh.com/

== pohGwvQVZIpAHa ==

efn94r <a href="http://ivjjhobeabhp.com/">ivjjhobeabhp</a>