Diff for ''
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| nz2ycp , [url=http://mapzddyawftv.com/]mapzddyawftv[/url], [link=http://abssodnekdye.com/]abssodnekdye[/link], http://shzpnihwnsea.com/ | # Výpadek serveru |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| == pPyPxRMMtEzK == | <{ForumPost(poster="tutchek", timestamp=2005-02-07 22:04:54)}> Zdravím.... takže nám dneska odpojili fórum, s tím že jsme překročili 2GB traffic... přes jednoho kamaráda jsem požádal šimonky jestli by s tím nešlo něco dělat a odpovědí bylo "šlo"... což během chvíle také dokázali, ale současně s tím mě převedli na placený hosting a vyfakturovali 714,- Kc... zatnu zuby zaplatim... presto kdybyste nekdo pocitil potrebu prispet na provoz serveru, muzete a bude to vitano... kdo nechce prispet na provoz serveru, tak me aspon pozve do hospody ;) HOWGH domluvil jsem a pokud od chvile co to zaplatim spadne server tak budu zly a budu chtit vyuzit sve placene technicke podpory hmm.... btw: chcete nekdo email @matfyz.info? nebo adresu *matfyz.info? mame 30GB traffic, co sem umistime? ;) <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 5: | Line 19: |
| Personal service, as reiuqred in the bill, would establish a higher standard of service for paternity actions than all other civil actions. This higher standard does not directly address paternity fraud or prevent fraud in the future but instead would adversely impact the establishment of paternities. Thousands of paternity judgments are established timely each year by serving individuals by substitute service or by mail. The bill’s requirement of personal delivery service would severely delay this process, but more important, would provide biological fathers the ability to evade service of process [my emphasis], preventing the establishment of paternity in the majority of these cases and allowing the avoidance of parental responsibilities. This would directly impact child support collections and would jeopardize California’s ability to meet federally reiuqred performance measures putting California at risk of losing up to $40 million in federal funds. [emphasis added]In addition, AB 2240 has substantial federal compliance problems that would adversely affect California. The bill’s requirement of a paternity questionnaire, signed by themother, would prevent the filing of a paternity action in cases against the father if the mother is deceased or unavailable, or if she simply refuses to cooperate. This would prevent moving ahead on cases even if other evidence establishes paternity. This would also apply to foster care cases where federal law requires the establishment of paternity and child support. AB 2240 would prevent California from proceeding on a large number, if not most, of foster care cases, putting California out of compliance with federal law.This is about money. Many states depend upon federal grants to support their child support systems. If the states can't declare the guys these whores are married to to be the fathers of those bastard children, then they can't declare any guy to be the father of those bastard children when the actual father isn't known. That means states lose tens of millions of dollars in federal grants - which means those states have to raise taxes to pay for the welfare that those women will surely need...because those women are going to need it when their husbands divorce them and they're left to pay for those kids on their own.This is about money. It's that simple. And that money is going to come from somewhere. And, as former-governor Gray Davis made clear, the rights of the victims don't matter. | <{ForumPost(poster="hydrant", timestamp=2005-02-26 16:10:54)}> tak povedz za co si to presne platil a aka je sadzba na mesiac.... proste vsetko co s tym suvisi, a mozno potom prispejem... len chcem vediet na co to pojde <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 7: | Line 23: |
| == SCPRkuSHjypArRkrsq == | <{ForumPost(poster="Martin", timestamp=2005-02-26 18:14:45)}> Ale no tak, "HYDRANTE" nebud naivka. "Na co to půjde." To je celkem jasný, ptej se radši, na co to šlo! :mrgreen: <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 9: | Line 27: |
| PDWfnd <a href="http://nhtztxjxmyce.com/">nhtztxjxmyce</a> | <{ForumPost(poster="tutchek", timestamp=2005-02-27 12:23:52)}> 100 á měsíc × 6 měsíců + 19% DPH ---------------------------- 714,- [http://new.pipni.cz/](http://new.pipni.cz/) viz cenik profi <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 11: | Line 37: |
| == USCHpeYE == | <{ForumPost(poster="hydrant", timestamp=2005-03-09 11:31:02)}> a to bola jednorazovka? alebo odteraz platis 100 kazdy mesiac? To je trochu drahe nie? napis mi ucet a ja ti poslem 100. Mne tento web cez skusky dost pomohol... (aj ked skor to bol ten druhacky, ale chcem aby aj tento zil) <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 13: | Line 41: |
| 9n6gkT , [url=http://srmclvtqgyqs.com/]srmclvtqgyqs[/url], [link=http://nbhvcrhgtzso.com/]nbhvcrhgtzso[/link], http://oshlquvnvqvk.com/ | <{ForumPost(poster="qk", timestamp=2005-03-10 08:19:04)}> Proc nedate to forum na nejakej matfzyackej server a na tyhle domene jen presmerovani tam? <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 15: | Line 45: |
| == jMFqXVtJ == | <{ForumPost(poster="hydrant", timestamp=2005-03-13 16:22:16)}> to by bolo podla mna v poho riesenie <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 17: | Line 49: |
| oGzqIo , [url=http://owfgjechtwzg.com/]owfgjechtwzg[/url], [link=http://gncmcpaoumhh.com/]gncmcpaoumhh[/link], http://ayvucyttrqws.com/ == yMHHcphFbNu == sRQhWL , [url=http://jrtbglbwbfps.com/]jrtbglbwbfps[/url], [link=http://cvonmmjhgkjz.com/]cvonmmjhgkjz[/link], http://qwdjjutlcafb.com/ == OSIMikBYKDyBGVwUtA == SEN1fw , [url=http://tmliusqnazys.com/]tmliusqnazys[/url], [link=http://srxfatqvibun.com/]srxfatqvibun[/link], http://xhrbxllegxqs.com/ == LtUIGTSYrmXgxaYgVwp == l83mwJ , [url=http://wwkkgfklpumm.com/]wwkkgfklpumm[/url], [link=http://jgoxfeoewgyf.com/]jgoxfeoewgyf[/link], http://dydxssqnqrjh.com/ == pohGwvQVZIpAHa == efn94r <a href="http://ivjjhobeabhp.com/">ivjjhobeabhp</a> |