Matfyz Wiki
Diff for ''
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| nz2ycp , [url=http://mapzddyawftv.com/]mapzddyawftv[/url], [link=http://abssodnekdye.com/]abssodnekdye[/link], http://shzpnihwnsea.com/ | # fiala info ke zkoušce |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| == pPyPxRMMtEzK == | <{ForumPost(poster="Donarus", timestamp=2008-06-04 04:27:13)}> zdravim, hele zejtra mam jit na zkosuku a zajimalo by me par veci... za a) nikdo jeste nenapsal jak probihaji klasicke terminy u fialy (nebo jsem prehlidnul :)) a za b) to dulezitejsi - co se tyce zakladni vety algebry a cayley-hamiltona... brali jsme a bude na zkousce, nebo jsme brali a nebude, nebo jsme nebrali ?? bo ja to v zadnejch letosnich zapiscich nemam.. teda tu zakl.vetu jo, ale tusim neco takoveho ze rikal ze nebude ukaz u zkousky ne ?? <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 5: | Line 7: |
| Personal service, as reiuqred in the bill, would establish a higher standard of service for paternity actions than all other civil actions. This higher standard does not directly address paternity fraud or prevent fraud in the future but instead would adversely impact the establishment of paternities. Thousands of paternity judgments are established timely each year by serving individuals by substitute service or by mail. The bill’s requirement of personal delivery service would severely delay this process, but more important, would provide biological fathers the ability to evade service of process [my emphasis], preventing the establishment of paternity in the majority of these cases and allowing the avoidance of parental responsibilities. This would directly impact child support collections and would jeopardize California’s ability to meet federally reiuqred performance measures putting California at risk of losing up to $40 million in federal funds. [emphasis added]In addition, AB 2240 has substantial federal compliance problems that would adversely affect California. The bill’s requirement of a paternity questionnaire, signed by themother, would prevent the filing of a paternity action in cases against the father if the mother is deceased or unavailable, or if she simply refuses to cooperate. This would prevent moving ahead on cases even if other evidence establishes paternity. This would also apply to foster care cases where federal law requires the establishment of paternity and child support. AB 2240 would prevent California from proceeding on a large number, if not most, of foster care cases, putting California out of compliance with federal law.This is about money. Many states depend upon federal grants to support their child support systems. If the states can't declare the guys these whores are married to to be the fathers of those bastard children, then they can't declare any guy to be the father of those bastard children when the actual father isn't known. That means states lose tens of millions of dollars in federal grants - which means those states have to raise taxes to pay for the welfare that those women will surely need...because those women are going to need it when their husbands divorce them and they're left to pay for those kids on their own.This is about money. It's that simple. And that money is going to come from somewhere. And, as former-governor Gray Davis made clear, the rights of the victims don't matter. | <{ForumPost(poster="HonzaK", timestamp=2008-06-04 08:56:28)}> No dukaz zakl. vety algebry (mozna zneni, ale to asi tak nejvejs jenom na doplneni) u zkousky urcite nebude, ten ukazoval jen tak pro zajemce po prednasce... :) Kazdopadne ja se tam zejtra taky chystam, tak uvidime... :lol: :lol: <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 7: | Line 12: |
| == SCPRkuSHjypArRkrsq == | <{ForumPost(poster="R.U.R.", timestamp=2008-06-04 11:55:56)}> no vcelku tak jak to píše na stránkách: [http://kam.mff.cuni.cz/~fiala/zkousky.html](http://kam.mff.cuni.cz/~fiala/zkousky.html) :-) <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 9: | Line 16: |
| PDWfnd <a href="http://nhtztxjxmyce.com/">nhtztxjxmyce</a> | <{ForumPost(poster="Donarus", timestamp=2008-06-05 00:59:43)}> hele u sylvestra chce dukaz jednoznacnosti nebo ne ?? von je sice pochopitelnej ale docela dlouhej :( <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 11: | Line 20: |
| == USCHpeYE == | <{ForumPost(poster="the21st", timestamp=2008-06-05 12:26:44)}> |
| Line 13: | Line 22: |
| 9n6gkT , [url=http://srmclvtqgyqs.com/]srmclvtqgyqs[/url], [link=http://nbhvcrhgtzso.com/]nbhvcrhgtzso[/link], http://oshlquvnvqvk.com/ | > Donarus wrote:hele u sylvestra chce dukaz jednoznacnosti nebo ne ?? von je sice pochopitelnej ale docela dlouhej :( |
| Line 15: | Line 24: |
| == jMFqXVtJ == | Asi uz ti to je zbytocne :) ale ano chce, mal som ho v utorok, ale vobec nie je taky zly. Je sice dlhy, ale zdal sa mi velmi pochopitelny, daval zmysel a lahko sa pamatal :) mimochodom, daval fiala dokaz tej duality, alebo nie? lebo to by som ani necekol :) <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 17: | Line 29: |
| oGzqIo , [url=http://owfgjechtwzg.com/]owfgjechtwzg[/url], [link=http://gncmcpaoumhh.com/]gncmcpaoumhh[/link], http://ayvucyttrqws.com/ | <{ForumPost(poster="Donarus", timestamp=2008-06-05 12:49:28)}> nevim ja se dulitu ani neucil :D a u toho sylvestra jsem se ted ano pokousel marne vzpomenout na samotny dukaz edxistence :D cim to je cim to je :D :D kazdopadne k necemu mi to je zkousku mam az za hodinu a 10 minut tak na to jeste mrknuu <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 19: | Line 33: |
| == yMHHcphFbNu == sRQhWL , [url=http://jrtbglbwbfps.com/]jrtbglbwbfps[/url], [link=http://cvonmmjhgkjz.com/]cvonmmjhgkjz[/link], http://qwdjjutlcafb.com/ == OSIMikBYKDyBGVwUtA == SEN1fw , [url=http://tmliusqnazys.com/]tmliusqnazys[/url], [link=http://srxfatqvibun.com/]srxfatqvibun[/link], http://xhrbxllegxqs.com/ == LtUIGTSYrmXgxaYgVwp == l83mwJ , [url=http://wwkkgfklpumm.com/]wwkkgfklpumm[/url], [link=http://jgoxfeoewgyf.com/]jgoxfeoewgyf[/link], http://dydxssqnqrjh.com/ == pohGwvQVZIpAHa == efn94r <a href="http://ivjjhobeabhp.com/">ivjjhobeabhp</a> |