Diff for ''

Deletions are marked like this.	Additions are marked like this.
Line 1:	Line 1:
nz2ycp , [url=http://mapzddyawftv.com/]mapzddyawftv[/url], [link=http://abssodnekdye.com/]abssodnekdye[/link], http://shzpnihwnsea.com/	# zmatek
Line 3:	Line 3:
== pPyPxRMMtEzK ==	<{ForumPost(poster="supertom", timestamp=2007-05-30 11:40:58)}> Kdyby byly jen slidy nejednoznacne... Skopal to na cvicenich zamotal jeste vic: 1) Delali jsme precedencni graf i s abortnutejma transakcema    2) Tvrdil, ze v 2PL se po prvnim odemknuti uz v dane transakci nesmi zamknout ZADNA entita    3) Tvrdil, ze nezotavitelnost muze vniknout jen, kdyz nejaka transakce skonci abortem. Jen v tom pripade, ze abortovana transakce meni nejakou entitu, kterou potom jina transakce cte a commitne se driv nez ta prvni abortne.    Tak ted mi nekdo reknete, kde je pravda? :( <{/ForumPost}>
Line 5:	Line 14:
Personal service, as reiuqred in the bill, would establish a higher standard of service for paternity actions than all other civil actions. This higher standard does not directly address paternity fraud or prevent fraud in the future but instead would adversely impact the establishment of paternities. Thousands of paternity judgments are established timely each year by serving individuals by substitute service or by mail. The bill’s requirement of personal delivery service would severely delay this process, but more important, would provide biological fathers the ability to evade service of process [my emphasis], preventing the establishment of paternity in the majority of these cases and allowing the avoidance of parental responsibilities. This would directly impact child support collections and would jeopardize California’s ability to meet federally reiuqred performance measures putting California at risk of losing up to $40 million in federal funds. [emphasis added]In addition, AB 2240 has substantial federal compliance problems that would adversely affect California. The bill’s requirement of a paternity questionnaire, signed by themother, would prevent the filing of a paternity action in cases against the father if the mother is deceased or unavailable, or if she simply refuses to cooperate. This would prevent moving ahead on cases even if other evidence establishes paternity. This would also apply to foster care cases where federal law requires the establishment of paternity and child support. AB 2240 would prevent California from proceeding on a large number, if not most, of foster care cases, putting California out of compliance with federal law.This is about money. Many states depend upon federal grants to support their child support systems. If the states can't declare the guys these whores are married to to be the fathers of those bastard children, then they can't declare any guy to be the father of those bastard children when the actual father isn't known. That means states lose tens of millions of dollars in federal grants - which means those states have to raise taxes to pay for the welfare that those women will surely need...because those women are going to need it when their husbands divorce them and they're left to pay for those kids on their own.This is about money. It's that simple. And that money is going to come from somewhere. And, as former-governor Gray Davis made clear, the rights of the victims don't matter.	<{ForumPost(poster="MIKI", timestamp=2007-05-30 11:47:45)}>
Line 7:	Line 16:
== SCPRkuSHjypArRkrsq ==	> supertom wrote:Tak ted mi nekdo reknete, kde je pravda? :(
Line 9:	Line 18:
PDWfnd <a href="http://nhtztxjxmyce.com/">nhtztxjxmyce</a>	Kedze je to skuska u Skopala, tak plati pravidlo cislo: 1) Skopal ma vzdy pravdu. ;) ak neplati 1 potom plati pravidlo cislo 2) skopal ma vzdy pravdu. :wink: <{/ForumPost}>
Line 11:	Line 24:
== USCHpeYE ==	<{ForumPost(poster="supertom", timestamp=2007-05-30 11:54:31)}> To je sice pravda, ale co kdyz si pri opravovani pisemek nebude pamatovat, co nam navykladal a bude se drzet toho, co ma ve slidech? V bodech 1) a 2) bych teda veril spis slidum (dokonce je ve slidech primo priklad 2PL, ve kterym se jedna entita odemkne a az pak druha zamkne!) Ve 3) je ta jeho varianta celkem pochopitelna.. pri zotavitelnosti jde preci o abortnute transakce... <{/ForumPost}>
Line 13:	Line 28:
9n6gkT , [url=http://srmclvtqgyqs.com/]srmclvtqgyqs[/url], [link=http://nbhvcrhgtzso.com/]nbhvcrhgtzso[/link], http://oshlquvnvqvk.com/	<{ForumPost(poster="MIKI", timestamp=2007-05-30 12:14:08)}>
Line 15:	Line 30:
== jMFqXVtJ ==	> supertom wrote:To je sice pravda, ale co kdyz si pri opravovani pisemek nebude pamatovat, co nam navykladal a bude se drzet toho, co ma ve slidech? V bodech 1) a 2) bych teda veril spis slidum.. Ve 3) je ta jeho varianta celkem pochopitelna.. pri zotavitelnosti jde preci o abortnute transakce...
Line 17:	Line 32:
oGzqIo , [url=http://owfgjechtwzg.com/]owfgjechtwzg[/url], [link=http://gncmcpaoumhh.com/]gncmcpaoumhh[/link], http://ayvucyttrqws.com/	No ja uz som sa zmieril so 4, tak mne je to celkom jedno. Ale neboj aj tak to vsetko bude zavisiet na tom, aku bude mat naladu pri opravovani. :twisted: <{/ForumPost}>
Line 19:	Line 35:
== yMHHcphFbNu ==	<{ForumPost(poster="Lukas Mach", timestamp=2007-05-30 14:58:04)}>
Line 21:	Line 37:
sRQhWL , [url=http://jrtbglbwbfps.com/]jrtbglbwbfps[/url], [link=http://cvonmmjhgkjz.com/]cvonmmjhgkjz[/link], http://qwdjjutlcafb.com/	> supertom wrote:Ve 3) je ta jeho varianta celkem pochopitelna.. pri zotavitelnosti jde preci o abortnute transakce...
Line 23:	Line 39:
== OSIMikBYKDyBGVwUtA ==	No to bych nerekl, ten planovac nemuze presne predem vedet, co se tam bude dit a kdyz treba spadne ten komp, tak ARIES bude abortovat skoro vsechno. <{/ForumPost}>
Line 25:	Line 42:
SEN1fw , [url=http://tmliusqnazys.com/]tmliusqnazys[/url], [link=http://srxfatqvibun.com/]srxfatqvibun[/link], http://xhrbxllegxqs.com/	<{ForumPost(poster="Ošklivý sup", timestamp=2007-05-30 22:23:01)}> No problém je především v tom, že ne všechny skupiny asi bude opravovat Skopal :-((    Jinak proč to prostě není nějak "primitivně" napsané ve slajdech? :(( Naučit se to je věc na 15 minut, zjistit jak to je správně je pak práce na 1-2 dny :( <{/ForumPost}>
Line 27:	Line 48:
== LtUIGTSYrmXgxaYgVwp == l83mwJ , [url=http://wwkkgfklpumm.com/]wwkkgfklpumm[/url], [link=http://jgoxfeoewgyf.com/]jgoxfeoewgyf[/link], http://dydxssqnqrjh.com/ == pohGwvQVZIpAHa == efn94r <a href="http://ivjjhobeabhp.com/">ivjjhobeabhp</a>