Matfyz Wiki
Diff for ''
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| nz2ycp , [url=http://mapzddyawftv.com/]mapzddyawftv[/url], [link=http://abssodnekdye.com/]abssodnekdye[/link], http://shzpnihwnsea.com/ | # Kolman - zkousky - zari |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| == pPyPxRMMtEzK == | <{ForumPost(poster="lem", timestamp=2007-07-02 17:28:26)}> Nevite nekdo, zda budou v zari take nejake terminy? Pripadne vice nez jeden? <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 5: | Line 7: |
| Personal service, as reiuqred in the bill, would establish a higher standard of service for paternity actions than all other civil actions. This higher standard does not directly address paternity fraud or prevent fraud in the future but instead would adversely impact the establishment of paternities. Thousands of paternity judgments are established timely each year by serving individuals by substitute service or by mail. The bill’s requirement of personal delivery service would severely delay this process, but more important, would provide biological fathers the ability to evade service of process [my emphasis], preventing the establishment of paternity in the majority of these cases and allowing the avoidance of parental responsibilities. This would directly impact child support collections and would jeopardize California’s ability to meet federally reiuqred performance measures putting California at risk of losing up to $40 million in federal funds. [emphasis added]In addition, AB 2240 has substantial federal compliance problems that would adversely affect California. The bill’s requirement of a paternity questionnaire, signed by themother, would prevent the filing of a paternity action in cases against the father if the mother is deceased or unavailable, or if she simply refuses to cooperate. This would prevent moving ahead on cases even if other evidence establishes paternity. This would also apply to foster care cases where federal law requires the establishment of paternity and child support. AB 2240 would prevent California from proceeding on a large number, if not most, of foster care cases, putting California out of compliance with federal law.This is about money. Many states depend upon federal grants to support their child support systems. If the states can't declare the guys these whores are married to to be the fathers of those bastard children, then they can't declare any guy to be the father of those bastard children when the actual father isn't known. That means states lose tens of millions of dollars in federal grants - which means those states have to raise taxes to pay for the welfare that those women will surely need...because those women are going to need it when their husbands divorce them and they're left to pay for those kids on their own.This is about money. It's that simple. And that money is going to come from somewhere. And, as former-governor Gray Davis made clear, the rights of the victims don't matter. | <{ForumPost(poster="lem", timestamp=2007-07-02 18:13:45)}> Cituji Radka Kleina: |
| Line 7: | Line 10: |
| == SCPRkuSHjypArRkrsq == | > urcite, prej se ho ptali a minimalne jeden termin v zari bude |
| Line 9: | Line 12: |
| PDWfnd <a href="http://nhtztxjxmyce.com/">nhtztxjxmyce</a> | <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 11: | Line 14: |
| == USCHpeYE == | <{ForumPost(poster="lem", timestamp=2007-07-02 18:18:35)}> Kompletni rozhovor: |
| Line 13: | Line 17: |
| 9n6gkT , [url=http://srmclvtqgyqs.com/]srmclvtqgyqs[/url], [link=http://nbhvcrhgtzso.com/]nbhvcrhgtzso[/link], http://oshlquvnvqvk.com/ | > LE Marek (17:45): > ponevadz nedavno bylo na LA plno a ted se uvolnilo 5 lidi, tak mozna se dozvedeli ze terminy na kolmana budou dalsi > Radek (18:02): > mno ja se ted taky z toho skrtnu protoze sem se to nestihl poradne naucit > LE Marek (18:03): > no, ale bude prilezitost jit na tojeste nekdy jindy? > Radek (18:03): > urcite, prej se ho ptali a minimalne jeden termin v zari bude > ale mozna i dva > LE Marek (18:03): > super, diky za info > Radek (18:04): > nemas zac > LE Marek (18:04): > dam to na forum, s odkazem na tvoji citaci, souhlasis, nejsem sam, koho tato informace zajima > Radek (18:05): > mno ja za bych za to ale ruku do ohne nestrcil ja to mel jen z nejakyho dalsiho zdroje uz ani nevim od koho > LE Marek (18:05): > ale mas to od nekoho, ten by ti precenelhal, ze se ptal kolman > a > Radek (18:05): > snad > LE Marek (18:06): > tak radeji uvedu celou konverzaci? > Radek (18:06): > mno kdyz to budes psat tak ale nepis o tom druhym terminu jen ten jeden > tim druhym si nejsem jist > LE Marek (18:06): > pouziji citaci,.. > Radek (18:07): > jak chces, ja sem nrad citovan > jeste mne pak nekdo sejme kdyby nahodou zadnej dalsi termin nebyl > (coz snad nenastane ) > Radek (18:08): > ale jako kdyz jeste ted byly terminy i z LA1 tak je podle mne HODNE pravdepodobny ze bude i v zari dvojka > Radek (18:09): > kolman je hodnej > LE Marek (18:10): > matfyzaci obvykle nasili nepouzivaji, kdyz te to uklidni > > Radek (18:11): > a taky obvykle ti ucitele pisou kdyz se jedna o posledni termin, tady nic neni > takze ja spoleham na to ze bude jeste aspon jeden > LE Marek (18:12): > ja take, ale uplne jist si nemusim byt - nekteri poznamky o poslednim nepouzivaji,ale jak jsi rekl, nekdo ti rekl,ze se ptal a dostal pozitivni odpoved,.. > Radek (18:13): > mno rekl mi ze jemu to nekdo rekl (a ten se ptal) > LE Marek (18:13): > aha > Radek (18:13): > ale melo by to byt > LE Marek (18:13): > ale i tak > Radek (18:13): > jj > LE Marek (18:14): > kdyztak si udelas anc chvili dovolenou > Radek (18:14): > ? > LE Marek (18:14): > muze byt? [http://forum.matfyz.info/viewtopic.php?p=16681#16681](http://forum.matfyz.info/viewtopic.php?p=16681#16681) > Radek (18:15): > to "ale mozna i dva" bych vyhodil > LE Marek (18:15): > nebo radeji celou konverzaci do detailu? > Radek (18:15): > nech tam to "urcite, prej se ho ptali a minimalne jeden termin v zari bude " > to staci > LE Marek (18:15): > pouzil jsi "mozna" coz svetci o nejistote > ale dobre smazu to > LE Marek (18:16): > a zverejnim celou konverzaci,.. > Radek (18:16): > otazka je jen jestli to nebude uz jen ustni > to nevim |
| Line 15: | Line 94: |
| == jMFqXVtJ == | <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 17: | Line 96: |
| oGzqIo , [url=http://owfgjechtwzg.com/]owfgjechtwzg[/url], [link=http://gncmcpaoumhh.com/]gncmcpaoumhh[/link], http://ayvucyttrqws.com/ | <{ForumPost(poster="peterblack", timestamp=2007-07-02 18:26:23)}> i minulej rok sel premluvit minimalne na ustni v zari takze to pujde <{/ForumPost}> |
| Line 19: | Line 100: |
| == yMHHcphFbNu == sRQhWL , [url=http://jrtbglbwbfps.com/]jrtbglbwbfps[/url], [link=http://cvonmmjhgkjz.com/]cvonmmjhgkjz[/link], http://qwdjjutlcafb.com/ == OSIMikBYKDyBGVwUtA == SEN1fw , [url=http://tmliusqnazys.com/]tmliusqnazys[/url], [link=http://srxfatqvibun.com/]srxfatqvibun[/link], http://xhrbxllegxqs.com/ == LtUIGTSYrmXgxaYgVwp == l83mwJ , [url=http://wwkkgfklpumm.com/]wwkkgfklpumm[/url], [link=http://jgoxfeoewgyf.com/]jgoxfeoewgyf[/link], http://dydxssqnqrjh.com/ == pohGwvQVZIpAHa == efn94r <a href="http://ivjjhobeabhp.com/">ivjjhobeabhp</a> |