Diff for ''

Deletions are marked like this.	Additions are marked like this.
Line 1:	Line 1:
nz2ycp , [url=http://mapzddyawftv.com/]mapzddyawftv[/url], [link=http://abssodnekdye.com/]abssodnekdye[/link], http://shzpnihwnsea.com/	# lagy
Line 3:	Line 3:
== pPyPxRMMtEzK ==	<{ForumPost(poster="Kubees", timestamp=2012-02-03 21:16:02)}> Ahoj,    cele forum uz vice nez tyden dost odporne laguje. Nekdy min, nekdy vic a nekdy nejdou stranky nacist at se snazim jak chci. Cim to je? A dohlizi na to nekdo? Byla by vecna skoda, kdyby nefungovalo. Zalohuje ho aspon nekdo? :) <{/ForumPost}>
Line 5:	Line 9:
Personal service, as reiuqred in the bill, would establish a higher standard of service for paternity actions than all other civil actions. This higher standard does not directly address paternity fraud or prevent fraud in the future but instead would adversely impact the establishment of paternities. Thousands of paternity judgments are established timely each year by serving individuals by substitute service or by mail. The bill’s requirement of personal delivery service would severely delay this process, but more important, would provide biological fathers the ability to evade service of process [my emphasis], preventing the establishment of paternity in the majority of these cases and allowing the avoidance of parental responsibilities. This would directly impact child support collections and would jeopardize California’s ability to meet federally reiuqred performance measures putting California at risk of losing up to $40 million in federal funds. [emphasis added]In addition, AB 2240 has substantial federal compliance problems that would adversely affect California. The bill’s requirement of a paternity questionnaire, signed by themother, would prevent the filing of a paternity action in cases against the father if the mother is deceased or unavailable, or if she simply refuses to cooperate. This would prevent moving ahead on cases even if other evidence establishes paternity. This would also apply to foster care cases where federal law requires the establishment of paternity and child support. AB 2240 would prevent California from proceeding on a large number, if not most, of foster care cases, putting California out of compliance with federal law.This is about money. Many states depend upon federal grants to support their child support systems. If the states can't declare the guys these whores are married to to be the fathers of those bastard children, then they can't declare any guy to be the father of those bastard children when the actual father isn't known. That means states lose tens of millions of dollars in federal grants - which means those states have to raise taxes to pay for the welfare that those women will surely need...because those women are going to need it when their husbands divorce them and they're left to pay for those kids on their own.This is about money. It's that simple. And that money is going to come from somewhere. And, as former-governor Gray Davis made clear, the rights of the victims don't matter.	<{ForumPost(poster="peci1", timestamp=2012-02-04 15:45:57)}> Nejsi sam, sdilim tvuj problem (dneska je ta doba sdileni, zejo :) ).    Mam pro to jedine vysvetleni. Cesti Anonymous sidli na MS v kabinetech a kancelarich, a kdyz zrovna neutoci na politiky, tak svoje boty posilaji sem, protoze nechteji, abychom se pripravovali podle minulych zadani :-D <{/ForumPost}>
Line 7:	Line 15:
== SCPRkuSHjypArRkrsq ==	<{ForumPost(poster="John Beak", timestamp=2012-02-04 22:43:55)}> Já vim, co s tim maj. Je to rozbitý.    Podepisuju petici, jelikož jsem se sem sice (jako teprv třetí?) dostal, ale trvalo to déle, než jsem zvyklý. <{/ForumPost}>
Line 9:	Line 22:
PDWfnd <a href="http://nhtztxjxmyce.com/">nhtztxjxmyce</a>	<{ForumPost(poster="Almer", timestamp=2012-02-15 16:53:20)}> Tento rok pokud si vzpominam, tak jiz nejsme na placenem hostingu.    Tedy bezine na free pipni - tedy muzeme ocekavat lagy. A pokud vim, tak neni zarucene ani zalohovani. <{/ForumPost}>
Line 11:	Line 28:
== USCHpeYE ==	<{ForumPost(poster="rur", timestamp=2012-02-17 11:20:21)}> A to proto, že nejsou peníze, nebo proto, že se o to až do takové míry nikdo nestará? Ať tak či tak, to lagování je otravné, takže pokud s tím jde něco udělat, rád přiložím svou ruku. <{/ForumPost}>
Line 13:	Line 33:
9n6gkT , [url=http://srmclvtqgyqs.com/]srmclvtqgyqs[/url], [link=http://nbhvcrhgtzso.com/]nbhvcrhgtzso[/link], http://oshlquvnvqvk.com/	<{ForumPost(poster="Almer", timestamp=2012-02-21 14:48:18)}> Majitel tehle domeny zaplatil jenom za domenu...nikoliv za hosting, pac prestoupil na prava a to je pro nej "dulezite" ted.    Dokonce jsem mu nabidl ze mu na to prispeje SKAS, ale to odmitl...(musel by to totiz vyfakturovat jako prijem a to by se mu nelibilo na jeho danoveho priznani). <{/ForumPost}>
Line 15:	Line 39:
== jMFqXVtJ ==	<{ForumPost(poster="Him", timestamp=2012-02-21 17:14:35)}> Nemuze to tedy platit SKAS primo, tj. kdyz budou penize, tak zaplati hosting a kdyz nebudou, tak bude free hosting? Tj. ze by majitel forum jakoby "predal" SKASu. <{/ForumPost}>
Line 17:	Line 43:
oGzqIo , [url=http://owfgjechtwzg.com/]owfgjechtwzg[/url], [link=http://gncmcpaoumhh.com/]gncmcpaoumhh[/link], http://ayvucyttrqws.com/ == yMHHcphFbNu == sRQhWL , [url=http://jrtbglbwbfps.com/]jrtbglbwbfps[/url], [link=http://cvonmmjhgkjz.com/]cvonmmjhgkjz[/link], http://qwdjjutlcafb.com/ == OSIMikBYKDyBGVwUtA == SEN1fw , [url=http://tmliusqnazys.com/]tmliusqnazys[/url], [link=http://srxfatqvibun.com/]srxfatqvibun[/link], http://xhrbxllegxqs.com/ == LtUIGTSYrmXgxaYgVwp == l83mwJ , [url=http://wwkkgfklpumm.com/]wwkkgfklpumm[/url], [link=http://jgoxfeoewgyf.com/]jgoxfeoewgyf[/link], http://dydxssqnqrjh.com/ == pohGwvQVZIpAHa == efn94r <a href="http://ivjjhobeabhp.com/">ivjjhobeabhp</a>