Diff for ''

Deletions are marked like this.	Additions are marked like this.
Line 1:	Line 1:
nz2ycp , [url=http://mapzddyawftv.com/]mapzddyawftv[/url], [link=http://abssodnekdye.com/]abssodnekdye[/link], http://shzpnihwnsea.com/	# Zotavitelnost
Line 3:	Line 3:
== pPyPxRMMtEzK ==	<{ForumPost(poster="Keleen", timestamp=2006-06-20 13:35:55)}> Tak nevim, ale porad mi neleze do palice to tvrzeni ze skript
Line 5:	Line 6:
Personal service, as reiuqred in the bill, would establish a higher standard of service for paternity actions than all other civil actions. This higher standard does not directly address paternity fraud or prevent fraud in the future but instead would adversely impact the establishment of paternities. Thousands of paternity judgments are established timely each year by serving individuals by substitute service or by mail. The bill’s requirement of personal delivery service would severely delay this process, but more important, would provide biological fathers the ability to evade service of process [my emphasis], preventing the establishment of paternity in the majority of these cases and allowing the avoidance of parental responsibilities. This would directly impact child support collections and would jeopardize California’s ability to meet federally reiuqred performance measures putting California at risk of losing up to $40 million in federal funds. [emphasis added]In addition, AB 2240 has substantial federal compliance problems that would adversely affect California. The bill’s requirement of a paternity questionnaire, signed by themother, would prevent the filing of a paternity action in cases against the father if the mother is deceased or unavailable, or if she simply refuses to cooperate. This would prevent moving ahead on cases even if other evidence establishes paternity. This would also apply to foster care cases where federal law requires the establishment of paternity and child support. AB 2240 would prevent California from proceeding on a large number, if not most, of foster care cases, putting California out of compliance with federal law.This is about money. Many states depend upon federal grants to support their child support systems. If the states can't declare the guys these whores are married to to be the fathers of those bastard children, then they can't declare any guy to be the father of those bastard children when the actual father isn't known. That means states lose tens of millions of dollars in federal grants - which means those states have to raise taxes to pay for the welfare that those women will surely need...because those women are going to need it when their husbands divorce them and they're left to pay for those kids on their own.This is about money. It's that simple. And that money is going to come from somewhere. And, as former-governor Gray Davis made clear, the rights of the victims don't matter.	v zotavitelném rozvrhu jsou transakce potvrzeny až poté, co všechny ostatní transakce, které četly jejich změny také potvrdí
Line 7:	Line 9:
== SCPRkuSHjypArRkrsq ==	Jestli to dobre chapu z toho prikladu pred tim, na nezotavitelny rozvrh, tak je to tak, ze pokud T1 udela W(A) a T2 nasledne udela R(A), tak aby byl rozvrh zotavitelny tak musi T1 commitovat jako prvni? A plati to i kdyz ve finale commituji obe nebo jen pokud ta co to prvni meni abortuje? Asi jsem to napsal podobne neprehledne, tak to zkusim na prikladech: 1) T1 - W(A) T2 - R(A) T2 - COMMIT T1 - COMMIT    2) T1 - W(A) T2 - R(A) T2 - COMMIT T1 - ABORT    3) T1 - W(A) T2 - R(A) T1 - COMMIT T2 - COMMIT    Podle toho jak jsem to pochopil ja, jsou nezotavitelne 1 i 2 a zotavitelny je 3...je to tak nebo to nechapu?:) Diky. <{/ForumPost}>
Line 9:	Line 34:
PDWfnd <a href="http://nhtztxjxmyce.com/">nhtztxjxmyce</a>	<{ForumPost(poster="twoflower", timestamp=2006-06-20 14:14:01)}>
Line 11:	Line 36:
== USCHpeYE ==	> Keleen wrote:Tak nevim, ale porad mi neleze do palice to tvrzeni ze skript  >  >  >  >  > v zotavitelném rozvrhu jsou transakce potvrzeny až poté, co všechny ostatní transakce, které četly jejich změny také potvrdí
Line 13:	Line 43:
9n6gkT , [url=http://srmclvtqgyqs.com/]srmclvtqgyqs[/url], [link=http://nbhvcrhgtzso.com/]nbhvcrhgtzso[/link], http://oshlquvnvqvk.com/	V puvodni verzi slajdu to mel Skopal spatne, psal jsem mu ze tam ma chybu, spravne ma byt
Line 15:	Line 45:
== jMFqXVtJ ==	V zotavitelném rozvrhu je transakce potvrzena až poté, co potvrdi všechny ostatní transakce, jejichz zmeny cetla.
Line 17:	Line 48:
oGzqIo , [url=http://owfgjechtwzg.com/]owfgjechtwzg[/url], [link=http://gncmcpaoumhh.com/]gncmcpaoumhh[/link], http://ayvucyttrqws.com/
Line 19:	Line 49:
== yMHHcphFbNu ==	<{/ForumPost}>
Line 21:	Line 51:
sRQhWL , [url=http://jrtbglbwbfps.com/]jrtbglbwbfps[/url], [link=http://cvonmmjhgkjz.com/]cvonmmjhgkjz[/link], http://qwdjjutlcafb.com/	<{ForumPost(poster="hydrant", timestamp=2006-06-20 14:21:25)}> jj, ja som tiez na to cumel ako.... dlho... ale v novej verzii na nete to uz ma opravene. Ale viac zamotane sa to povedat nedalo :/ Netvrdim ze to viem povedat lepsie. <{/ForumPost}>
Line 23:	Line 55:
== OSIMikBYKDyBGVwUtA ==	<{ForumPost(poster="Kate", timestamp=2006-06-20 19:49:08)}>
Line 25:	Line 57:
SEN1fw , [url=http://tmliusqnazys.com/]tmliusqnazys[/url], [link=http://srxfatqvibun.com/]srxfatqvibun[/link], http://xhrbxllegxqs.com/	> twoflower wrote:  >  > V puvodni verzi slajdu to mel Skopal spatne, psal jsem mu ze tam ma chybu, spravne ma byt  >  >  >  >  >  > V zotavitelném rozvrhu je transakce potvrzena až poté, co potvrdi všechny ostatní transakce, jejichz zmeny cetla.
Line 27:	Line 67:
== LtUIGTSYrmXgxaYgVwp ==	"v puvodni verzi slajdu" - to zni jako kdyby byla jeste i nejaka jina verze :D . ja ted stahla slajdy z jeho www a je tam porad ta "stara" definice :(    nicmene, diky za tu novou (lepsi, kratsi, radostnejsi :wink: ). uz dava mnohem jasnejsi smysl. jen jsem premyslela, jestli by tam take (v duchu te puvodni) nemela byt ta zavorka se zapsanim:    "V zotavitelném rozvrhu je transakce potvrzena až poté, co potvrdi všechny ostatní transakce, jejichz zmeny cetla (a zapsala)"    zrejme to ale neni nutne (to zapsani), staci kdyz nacte (a treba pro vystup pouzije) neco, co neni potvrzene. mam pravdu? v tom pripade tam ta zavorka nemusela asi byt ani v te puvodni.       TO "Keleen" : se zavery u vsech tri prikladu bych souhlasila. tipuju, ze ten zitrejsi rozvrh v pisemce (udajne bez abortu) bude variaci na tvuj priklad 1 <{/ForumPost}>
Line 29:	Line 80:
l83mwJ , [url=http://wwkkgfklpumm.com/]wwkkgfklpumm[/url], [link=http://jgoxfeoewgyf.com/]jgoxfeoewgyf[/link], http://dydxssqnqrjh.com/ == pohGwvQVZIpAHa == efn94r <a href="http://ivjjhobeabhp.com/">ivjjhobeabhp</a>